Update: EFCC Secures Indefinite Court Order to Detain Social Media Critic Verydarkman Over Alleged Cybercrime

Social Media Personality Verydarkman Remanded by EFCC Amid Cybercrime Probe, Outrage Spreads Online

A prominent social media commentator known as Verydarkman (VDM) has been remanded in custody by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), following a court order secured by the agency. This development is tied to an ongoing investigation into alleged violations of Nigeria’s Cybercrimes Act, which may result in formal charges.

The order, issued by a competent court, is intended to allow the EFCC ample time to conclude its inquiries before moving ahead with prosecution. This measure, while legal, has ignited a wave of public criticism, with civil society groups and online communities raising alarm over what they view as a pattern of using state power to suppress dissent.

VDM was arrested on Friday afternoon at a bank branch located in Abuja’s Wuse district. Witnesses at the scene recounted how the outspoken critic was approached by a joint task force comprising operatives from the EFCC, the Department of State Services (DSS), and officers from the Nigeria Police Force. The arrest took place moments after he exited the banking premises.

His apprehension immediately sent shockwaves through digital spaces. Hashtags such as #FreeVDM quickly began trending on social media platforms, with thousands of users expressing concern over what they described as a growing crackdown on freedom of expression. Many users interpreted the arrest as a targeted attack against a prominent voice who has frequently challenged public institutions and individuals in positions of power.

Multiple sources familiar with the investigation revealed that the EFCC is relying on provisions within the Cybercrimes Act to build its case against VDM. The law, which empowers the commission to investigate financial and internet-based crimes, has become a pivotal tool in Nigeria’s fight against cyber-related offenses. However, critics argue that its vague provisions make it ripe for abuse, especially when applied against those who express controversial or unpopular opinions online.

One senior official from the EFCC, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, confirmed that the agency had obtained the remand order to legally detain VDM during the investigation phase. “The remand order was granted to allow us to complete our investigation and finalize the charges,” the source disclosed. “He would be arraigned once we conclude that process, and the charges are expected to be substantial.”

While details of the alleged offenses have yet to be disclosed, speculation continues to swirl about the nature of the evidence the EFCC has compiled. For now, VDM remains in EFCC custody, with his legal counsel working to secure access to him and potentially challenge the basis of his detention.

Deji Adeyanju, the lawyer representing VDM, issued a formal statement asserting their efforts to engage the authorities and insisting that his client’s legal rights must be upheld. Adeyanju did not confirm whether a bail application had been filed, but indicated that multiple legal strategies were being considered.

The EFCC, for its part, has remained silent. No official press release has been issued since the arrest, further fueling public speculation and mistrust. Observers note that the agency’s reluctance to offer clarity or justification may only deepen the controversy surrounding the case.

Public reaction has been swift and polarized. Supporters of VDM argue that his arrest underscores a disturbing trend in which security forces are increasingly deployed to silence activists, journalists, and online influencers critical of the status quo. They point to a growing list of similar incidents where social media figures have faced legal troubles after calling out corruption or misconduct by powerful individuals.

Others contend that no one should be above the law and stress the importance of following due process, especially when it comes to cybercrimes, which have become increasingly sophisticated and damaging. Still, many agree that transparency is essential if public trust in institutions is to be maintained.

Legal analysts have also weighed in, emphasizing the importance of balancing national security and crime prevention with the preservation of fundamental rights. “While the state has a duty to investigate and prosecute cybercrimes, it must do so without undermining civil liberties or appearing to stifle critical voices,” one constitutional lawyer remarked.

As the days unfold, the spotlight remains fixed on the EFCC, with the public and legal community awaiting the outcome of the investigation and the formal charges that may follow. Meanwhile, the online momentum behind #FreeVDM shows no signs of abating, raising the stakes for authorities navigating a delicate intersection of law enforcement and public accountability.

Will the EFCC be able to present a solid case, or will this become another flashpoint in Nigeria’s ongoing debate over the limits of free expression in a digital age? For now, the nation watches closely, divided in opinion but united in attention.