Van Vicker Expresses Deep Concern Over Alleged On-Set Assault Involving Zubby Michael and Godwin Nnadiekwe [VIDEO]

 

Van Vicker Weighs In on Alarming On-Set Incident Involving Godwin Nnadiekwe and Zubby Michael

Renowned Ghanaian actor Van Vicker has voiced his deep concern following reports of a disturbing incident involving Nigerian actors Zubby Michael and Godwin Nnadiekwe during a film shoot. The episode, which has ignited waves of concern across the African entertainment industry, centers around an alleged physical altercation in which Zubby Michael reportedly kicked his colleague, leading to serious internal injuries.

The troubling claim first surfaced across several entertainment news platforms, where it was alleged that Zubby, during what should have been a choreographed scene, aggressively kicked Godwin Nnadiekwe in a manner that transcended the boundaries of performance. The blow reportedly resulted in internal bleeding for Nnadiekwe, casting a shadow over the conduct of on-set behavior and safety measures in Nollywood.

Reacting to the reports, Van Vicker took to Instagram to share his thoughts, calling the headline “extremely disquieting.” Although careful not to cast judgment prematurely, the actor emphasized the gravity of the allegations, indicating that he has yet to verify the authenticity of the claim.

"Extremely disquieting,” Vicker wrote, referencing the headlines surrounding the incident. “I am hoping this is not true. I am yet to authenticate the story, but if there is any truth to it, then this is truly disturbing.” His words underscore a sentiment many in the industry are beginning to echo—if the reports are accurate, then there is a serious issue at hand that demands immediate attention.

Hollywood and Nollywood actors alike are no strangers to intense action scenes and emotionally charged performances. However, a clear line exists between method acting and reckless behavior. If the allegations against Zubby Michael hold weight, it could call into question not only the safety practices on set but also the extent to which actors respect each other’s physical and emotional boundaries during filming.

Zubby Michael, known for his high-energy roles and commanding screen presence, has yet to make a public statement regarding the alleged incident. Neither his representatives nor the film production company involved have issued any clarifications or statements as of this writing. Meanwhile, Godwin Nnadiekwe's condition remains a focal point of concern for fans and colleagues alike, as sources suggest he is receiving medical treatment for his injuries.

The incident has sparked a larger conversation within the African film community about professional ethics, on-set safety protocols, and the need for conflict resolution mechanisms. Industry insiders are beginning to question whether Nollywood and its affiliate industries have adequate structures in place to handle such situations—both to prevent them and to ensure accountability when they occur.

Van Vicker’s response is being seen not just as a reaction, but as a call for introspection. Known for his diplomacy and measured public statements, his decision to address the issue—while still awaiting full facts—reflects a broader concern about maintaining professionalism in the industry.

Public reactions have been swift, with many fans expressing disappointment and calling for a thorough investigation. Social media has been ablaze with commentary, with some defending Zubby Michael, suggesting that the act may have been misinterpreted or exaggerated, while others demand transparency and justice for Nnadiekwe.

Questions linger as the silence from Zubby Michael grows more conspicuous. Whether this will escalate into legal proceedings or a formal industry reprimand remains to be seen. However, what is clear is that the African entertainment world is now watching closely, awaiting clarity and perhaps, accountability.

At a time when African cinema continues to gain global recognition, incidents like this threaten to undermine the hard-fought progress made in recent years. The need for clearer safety guidelines, actor protection policies, and industry watchdogs has never been more apparent.

As Van Vicker cautiously noted, authenticity must be established before conclusions are drawn. But his words strike at the core of the matter: if true, this incident represents more than a personal conflict—it is a glaring wake-up call for an industry striving to balance creativity with responsibility.