“A Broke Man Can Be Humble”: Apostle Suleman Declares Wealth Reveals a Man’s True Nature, Sparks Heated Debate

 

Apostle Johnson Suleman, a widely recognized voice in Nigerian Christianity, has ignited widespread discourse following a sermon where he drew a strong connection between financial status and a man’s character. His message, both direct and provocative, has rippled through religious circles and online platforms alike, prompting varied reactions and discussions about morality, relationships, and the influence of wealth.

Speaking passionately from the pulpit, Suleman asserted that financial resources serve as a litmus test for a man's values. He argued that the real essence of a man’s behavior is only revealed once he acquires financial stability. Without money, according to him, many men simply do not have the opportunity to fully display their character traits—whether noble or otherwise.

“You don’t have character as a man if you don’t have money,” Suleman proclaimed, emphasizing that humility during poverty can often be circumstantial rather than a result of inner conviction. He underscored that character should be measured not in times of struggle, but in seasons of abundance. The preacher believes that when money enters the equation, so too do pride, temptation, and the temptation to abuse power—factors that expose the depths of a person’s values.

He described the truly principled man as one who, despite being financially comfortable, still chooses humility over arrogance, faithfulness over indulgence, and respect over condescension. Particularly, he stressed that such a man would remain loyal in relationships, avoid the lure of promiscuity, and continue treating others—especially less affluent women—with dignity and regard.

This perspective struck a chord with many listeners, especially women, as Suleman advised them not to be deceived by a man’s seeming humility during financial hardship. His cautionary message: a man’s low income might mask flaws that will only surface once he experiences financial elevation. “A broke man can be humble,” he warned, “but that humility might vanish once the bank account is full.”

Social media platforms have since become a battleground of perspectives. Some applauded the sermon for its realism, noting that many individuals do undergo drastic behavioral changes once they become financially empowered. They argued that Suleman’s message is a valuable lesson in understanding human nature and a reminder not to make permanent decisions based on temporary conditions.

Others, however, pushed back, questioning whether financial capacity should be the sole determinant of character. Critics claimed that while money can indeed amplify existing traits, it is overly simplistic to dismiss the character of the poor altogether. A few also argued that such a message might unintentionally promote materialism or validate harmful stereotypes about men and wealth.

Despite the debates, the core of Suleman’s sermon has resonated deeply with many believers and skeptics alike. It has opened the door to deeper conversations about the role of money in human behavior and the dynamics of power within relationships. For some, it’s a wake-up call to reassess how they evaluate potential partners or judge personal growth. For others, it challenges long-held assumptions about virtue and the often romanticized idea of the humble, poor man.

What remains undisputed is that Apostle Suleman’s message has not gone unnoticed. It has stirred contemplation in both religious and secular circles, reinforcing his role not just as a preacher of faith, but also as a commentator on societal values. Whether one agrees or disagrees, the conversation is now alive and unfolding—extending far beyond the walls of his church.

His words stand as both a mirror and a provocation, urging men to evaluate their true selves beyond their current financial status, and encouraging women to look deeper when measuring a man’s integrity. Wealth, according to Suleman, does not corrupt a man—it simply reveals him.