“I’ll Not Relent Until Justice Is Served”: Valentine Ozigbo Challenges APC Primary Outcome in Anambra

 

Valentine Ozigbo, a notable figure in Anambra State politics and governorship aspirant under the All Progressives Congress (APC), has filed a legal challenge against the outcome of the party’s recently concluded primary election. His move has sparked fresh waves of attention within political circles, especially as the APC prepares for the 2025 governorship contest.

The former presidential adviser and respected businessman officially approached the Federal High Court in Awka, calling for the disqualification of Nicholas Ukachukwu, the candidate declared winner of the primary. Ozigbo’s legal action is grounded in what he described as serious violations of internal party rules and constitutional breaches that allegedly marred the selection process.

In a public post shared on his verified Facebook page, Ozigbo clarified that his court action is not motivated by personal vendetta. Rather, he emphasized that his aim is to protect democratic values and ensure internal processes within the APC remain transparent and fair. His statement reads like a manifesto of reform, striking a tone that resonates with many members of the party who have long expressed concern about internal party politics.

“Yesterday, at the Federal High Court in Awka, I stood not just for myself but also for justice, truth, and every Nigerian who believes in a better way,” Ozigbo declared in the post, offering insight into the conviction driving his court action.

He noted that the core of his challenge is to seek judicial redress against what he believes were flagrant breaches of the APC’s constitution and guidelines during the primaries. According to Ozigbo, the processes leading to the emergence of Ukachukwu as the APC’s standard bearer were flawed, lacking in transparency and riddled with procedural irregularities.

Political analysts view Ozigbo’s move as a bold one, considering the sensitive nature of intra-party disputes in Nigeria’s political terrain. Many have applauded his courage, highlighting that it takes a significant level of commitment to challenge entrenched political outcomes, especially within dominant party structures.

While Ukachukwu has yet to issue a formal response to the suit, party insiders say the APC is closely monitoring the development and may initiate internal reconciliation efforts. However, Ozigbo appears resolute in his path, stating that the ultimate goal is to preserve the sanctity of party democracy and the rule of law.

“The move is aimed at ensuring that integrity, due process, and fairness are upheld within the party’s internal processes,” Ozigbo said, reinforcing the message that he is not backing down from his quest to restore what he considers lost legitimacy.

He further added that Nigerian democracy cannot thrive if impunity continues to characterize political processes. His tone was deliberate, filled with urgency and a call for reform that goes beyond party lines.

“Our democracy cannot thrive where impunity reigns. Our people deserve better, and I will not relent until justice is served,” he remarked.

For many of Ozigbo’s supporters, his legal challenge represents a rare example of courage in the face of political adversity. Supporters online have echoed his sentiments, stating that the future of credible politics in Nigeria depends on people willing to challenge irregularities regardless of the risks.

In a closing note on his Facebook page, Ozigbo delivered a strong message intended to inspire those watching from the sidelines. “Let this be a reminder: the future belongs to those who refuse to look away when it matters most,” he wrote.

Observers say the unfolding legal battle could have far-reaching implications not only for the APC in Anambra but also for other political actors preparing for the 2025 elections. With the court now set to determine the legitimacy of the party’s candidate, the political atmosphere in Anambra is expected to remain tense in the coming weeks.

Valentine Ozigbo’s principled stance adds a new layer of complexity to the race, hinting at a broader struggle for internal party reforms. As the case progresses, political watchers will be keen to see whether the judiciary will uphold the outcome of the primary or side with the call for accountability and fairness.