Nollywood Star Jim Iyke Sparks Debate With Controversial Belief That Eating Once a Day is Ideal for Humans

 

Veteran Nollywood actor Jim Iyke has stirred a wave of debate across social media platforms and health circles following his recent comments on food and human nutrition. Speaking during a candid interview with Ghanaian radio station 3FM 102.7, the movie star passionately declared that food is overrated, calling it a societal scam. He went further to suggest that the human body was not designed to consume multiple meals a day, but rather, just one.

His comments have attracted widespread attention, largely due to the bold nature of his claims and the fact that he has no formal background in nutritional science. Still, Iyke insisted his statements were drawn from personal experience and deep introspection, not academic research or expert consultation.

He described food as a “disruptor” to his physical and mental performance. According to him, his energy levels and productivity are significantly higher when he avoids multiple meals. “I eat once a day,” he stated. “Food sounds like a disruptor for me. Once I eat, it’s downhill. I think my energy is pure and unbridled when I don’t eat.”

Jim Iyke revealed that he often prefers to remain in a semi-fasted state throughout the day, believing that hunger sharpens his mental focus and physical vitality. “Sometimes, I don’t want to share that space with food,” he explained. “Because food would begin to weigh me down, I would begin to enjoy it and send signals to my head that the day is ending, I need to sleep.”

The actor pointed out that his body tends to respond to food in ways that reduce his drive and motivation. He said that once he consumes a meal, especially early in the day, it activates a subconscious signal that suggests rest and relaxation, which, in his opinion, is counterproductive. “Your subconsciousness takes over with the manipulation and begins to tell you, you’ve tried today, you’ve eaten, take some time off,” he elaborated.

Calling food a scam, he argued that the glorification of frequent meals is largely a societal construct, and not necessarily rooted in the actual biological needs of the human body. “The human body is designed to eat just once a day,” Iyke insisted. He also emphasized the importance of the type of food consumed, stating that poor choices would inevitably lead to negative long-term consequences. “What you eat defines everything. The law of commutative effect will catch up with you every time you eat something wrong,” he warned.

Despite his confidence, Iyke’s statements sharply contrast with mainstream scientific advice. Leading nutritionists and medical experts generally recommend a balanced diet consisting of three meals a day, often with snacks in between, depending on individual energy needs. Many argue that spacing meals throughout the day helps stabilize blood sugar, manage hunger, and provide the body with a consistent energy supply.

There are also concerns about promoting restrictive eating without understanding the complex nutritional demands of different body types, lifestyles, and health conditions. Some experts have warned that advice like Iyke’s, especially coming from public figures with large followings, can mislead individuals into adopting unhealthy practices without proper guidance.

While intermittent fasting and one-meal-a-day (OMAD) diets have gained traction in recent years, especially within fitness communities, they remain controversial and are not universally recommended. Such practices may offer benefits for some individuals, particularly those looking to manage weight or insulin sensitivity, but they also come with risks like nutrient deficiencies, fatigue, and eating disorders if not properly managed.

Jim Iyke’s comments, although rooted in personal belief and experience, have inadvertently placed him at the center of a broader discussion about wellness, lifestyle, and the responsibilities of celebrities when discussing health-related topics. His unconventional take on food might resonate with some, particularly those exploring alternative health philosophies, but it also serves as a reminder of the importance of evidence-based guidance when making dietary decisions.

As debates continue to unfold, one thing remains certain: Iyke’s remarks have reignited age-old conversations about the nature of food, personal well-being, and how much of our daily habits are truly aligned with our biological design. Whether seen as enlightening or misleading, his perspective is a bold one that challenges conventional wisdom and invites further examination.