A United States Congresswoman, Nancy Mace, has described Nigeria as an increasingly unsafe country for Christians, calling attention to the escalating violence targeting religious communities. Speaking on Friday, November 14, 2025, the South Carolina lawmaker emphasized that Nigeria has become one of the deadliest countries in the world for Christians, raising alarm over the human cost of ongoing attacks.
Mace also criticized the Biden administration for its foreign policy decisions concerning Nigeria. She specifically highlighted the U.S. government’s recent removal of Nigeria from the Country of Particular Concern list, a move she described as deeply troubling. According to Mace, this reversal undermines efforts to address the persecution faced by Christians and signals a lack of prioritization of religious freedom in U.S. foreign policy.
The Congresswoman praised former President Donald Trump for his proactive approach to religious liberty, asserting that his efforts to reverse policy decisions regarding Nigeria demonstrate a stronger commitment to protecting Christian communities abroad. She argued that Trump’s actions reflect a leadership style that takes religious persecution seriously, contrasting it with the current administration’s approach.
Donald Trump has publicly reaffirmed concerns over attacks on Christians in Nigeria, declaring the country a “Country of Particular Concern” through his platform. He stated that Christianity faces an existential threat in Nigeria, attributing the violence to radical Islamist groups responsible for the mass killings. Trump also suggested that the U.S. might consider military action if the targeted killings continue, although details of any potential intervention remain unclear.
Other lawmakers have sought to temper expectations of direct military involvement. Congressman Bill Huizenga noted that Trump’s statements likely express frustration rather than an immediate plan for armed engagement. Speaking with Arise TV, he said, “I suspect that is not a high priority of having actual military intervention, specifically in Nigeria. While I don’t envision a surprise attack, I don’t envision that there’s going to be a military response.”
Instead, Huizenga suggested that targeted economic sanctions could serve as a more practical tool for addressing the violence. He proposed that sanctions against individuals and organizations involved in militant activity could disrupt financial networks and limit travel, thereby weakening the operational capabilities of groups perpetrating attacks. He emphasized that economic pressure could provide a meaningful and non-military response to the crisis.
The renewed debate in Washington highlights the ongoing tension between diplomatic measures and the threat of military intervention as U.S. policymakers grapple with how to respond to rising attacks on Christians in Nigeria. As calls for stronger action grow louder, the situation continues to draw global attention to the humanitarian and religious challenges facing the country.






0 Comments
Hey there! We love hearing from you. Feel free to share your thoughts, ask questions, or add to the conversation. Just keep it respectful, relevant, and free from spam. Let’s keep this space welcoming for everyone. Thanks for being part of the discussion! 😊