Sam Amadi Explains Why FCT Minister Nyesom Wike Cannot Override Soldier’s Lawful Orders In Abuja Clash

 

Sam Amadi, Director of the Abuja School of Social and Political Thought, has provided insight into the recent confrontation between the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Nyesom Wike, and Nigerian military personnel over access to land in the Gaduwa district of Abuja. Amadi emphasized that the FCT Minister does not have the authority to override orders given to soldiers, as he lacks the powers of the Commander-in-Chief.

The clash occurred on Tuesday when soldiers blocked Wike and his entourage from entering a parcel of land. Eyewitnesses reported that tensions escalated as the minister attempted to gain access despite the military presence. According to Amadi, the confrontation was unnecessary because the officer involved was performing his duties according to standard military procedures.

During an interview with Arise News, Amadi highlighted that the young naval officer acted appropriately by maintaining his position. He explained that the military officer was authorized to protect the location and that intervention by a civilian authority, even a minister, could not legally countermand those orders.

Amadi further underscored the statement made by the Defence Minister, noting that officers on lawful assignments must be protected by the state. The director suggested that Wike’s presence at the site with a group attempting to bypass the soldiers was avoidable. “It would have been more appropriate for the minister to complete the required formalities and report to the Inspector-General of Police, since the police are responsible for enforcing the law in Nigeria,” Amadi stated.

The expert observed that military personnel are trained to uphold instructions issued within their chain of command, and these directives cannot be overridden by civilian authorities. The naval officer, by adhering to his duties, ensured that the law and security protocols were respected, preventing a situation that could have led to broader conflicts.

This incident has drawn attention to the boundaries of ministerial authority in Nigeria, highlighting the clear separation between political office and military command. Amadi’s analysis reinforces the principle that civilian leaders, including ministers, cannot unilaterally interfere with operational military directives, which are designed to maintain order and security.

As the discussion continues, experts and stakeholders are calling for clarity on the roles of government officials in interactions with military and security forces. The event has sparked debate over protocol and authority, reminding the public of the structured hierarchy governing Nigeria’s defense and law enforcement agencies.

The confrontation in Gaduwa may serve as a case study in understanding how constitutional authority, military regulations, and civil governance intersect, with Amadi stressing that adherence to legal and procedural norms is critical for maintaining public order and institutional integrity.